Federal Circuit· 1/11/2002

H.R. Technologies, Inc. v. Astechnologies, Inc.

Citations

275 F.3d 1378
61 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1271
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 461
2002 WL 27521

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the plaintiffs complaint without prejudice for lack of standing
holding that a claim for attorney fees under § 285 is independently within the district court’s federal question jurisdiction
approving the district court’s dismissal of the plaintiffs complaint without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
applying Farmer to conclude that a defendant in a patent infringement case has standing to appeal a without-prejudice dismissal after moving to dismiss with prejudice
applying Farmer to conclude that a defendant in a patent infringement case has standing to appeal a without-prejudice dismissal after moving to dismiss with prejudice
“In order to have standing, the plaintiff in an action for patent infringement must be a ‘patentee’ pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 100(d) and 281 ..., ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Bryson, Dyk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.