Hoyt v. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that courts are to exclude requested hours that are “excessive, redundant[,] or otherwise unnecessary” (quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 434 (1983))
• accepting sanctions motion’s allegations of bad faith based on the failure to oppose them

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).