Hoyt v. Eklund

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the following factors should be considered when determining if the defendant has shown “good cause” for setting aside an entry of default: (1) whether the default was willful, (2
• the following factors should be considered when determining if the defendant has shown “good cause” for setting aside an entry of default: (1) whether the default was willful, (2) whether the plaintiff would be prejudiced if the default should be set aside, and (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Haugen v. Blaine Bank of Montana
  Montana Supreme Court· 1996-10-24· cited 33×
• Essex Insurance v. Jaycie, Inc.
  Montana Supreme Court· 2004-10-06· cited 20×
• Schmitz v. Vasquez
  Montana Supreme Court· 1998-12-23· cited 15×
• In Re the Marriage of Whiting
  Montana Supreme Court· 1993-06-23· cited 11×
• Waldher v. Federal Deposit Insurance
  Montana Supreme Court· 1997-03-18· cited 8×
• Bryden v. LAKESIDE VENTURES, LLC.
  Montana Supreme Court· 2009-09-29· cited 4×
• Nielsen v. HORNSTEINER
  Montana Supreme Court· 2012-05-08· cited 2×
• Stanko v. Acton
  Montana Supreme Court· 1999-09-28
• Babb v. Dvorak
  Montana Supreme Court· 2000-08-01

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lords v. Newman
  Montana Supreme Court· 1984-09-19· cited 62×
• Cribb v. Matlock Communications, Inc.
  Montana Supreme Court· 1989-01-30· cited 29×