Hoyt v. American Traders, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the lim- ited legislative history for ORS 93.740, which was enacted in 1909
• ORS 93.740 applies upon the “filing of a complaint in a civil action in which * * * any interest in * * * real property is involved”
• a debtor-spouse’s interest in property owned in a tenancy in its entirety, expires upon the death of the debtor-spouse and does not pass to the surviving spouse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Marriage of Muchesko v. Muchesko
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-09-30· cited 47×
• Miller v. CC Meisel Co., Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-08-07· cited 23×
• In Re: Rudie William Pletz, Debtor. Rudie William Pletz v. United States
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-08-10· cited 20×
• Oregon Account Systems, Inc. v. Greer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-03-01· cited 17×
• Vukanovich v. Kine
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-08-22· cited 9×
• Weaver v. Weaver
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-03-26· cited 8×
• Pedro v. Kipp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-04-22· cited 7×
• Indian Ridge I, LLC v. Lenahan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-09-22· cited 6×
• Wilde v. Mounts
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-03-08· cited 5×
• In Re Pletz
  D. Oregon· 1997-11-25· cited 4×
• Di Iorio v. Di Iorio
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-10-25· cited 3×
• In re the Marriage of Cortese
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-12-26· cited 3×
• Sanderson v. Heffington
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-07-13· cited 2×
• Strawn v. Eder
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-06-21· cited 2×
• Perkett v. Burrows
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-11-19· cited 1×

Other cases named Hoyt v. American Traders, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Hoyt v. American Traders, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1985-11-14· cited 3×