Skip to main content
· 6/6/2002

Hoyle v. Utica Mutual Insurance

Citations

  • 48 P.3d 1256
  • 137 Idaho 367
  • 2002 Ida. LEXIS 85

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that, even when the state seeks restitution from a defendant in a criminal action, the criminal case does not constitute a suit for damages
  • finding that a criminal case is not a \suit for damages\ under an insurance policy
  • indicating that the duty to defend is broader than the duty to indemnify, and, where a complaint does not reveal a potential for liability, there is no duty to indemnify
  • “[T]he term ‘improper’ is in no way synonymous with the word ‘negligent.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eismann, Kidwell, Schroeder, Trout, Walters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.