Hoxit v. Michelin Tire Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying the substantial evidence standard of review in affirming the commission’s factual finding that a claimant’s heart attack was not compensable since it did not result from unexpected strain or overexertion or unusual and extraordinary conditions of his employ ment
• The Commission is the sole fact-finder in workers’ compensation cases; if there is a conflict in the evidence, the Commission’s findings of fact are conclusive.
• the Commission, not the appellate court, is the sole factfinder in workers’ compensation cases

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).