Howson v. Dept. of Children and Families

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that petitioner is fit for sedentary work is insufficient without identification of specific jobs and a discussion or analysis as to how petitioner can perform those jobs
• reversing an order that identified listings in the appendix which were reviewed, but failed to refer to factual findings or evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).