Skip to main content
· 6/20/1901

Howley v. Maddocks

Citations

  • 25 Wash. 297
  • 65 P. 544
  • 1901 Wash. LEXIS 392

Syllabus

<p>BROKERS-ACTION FOR COMMISSIONS ON SALE OF REAL ESTATE-EVIDENCE-SUBSEQUENT IMPROVEMENTS.</p> <p>In an action to recover a commission agreed upon between plaintiff and defendant for tbe sale of tbe latter’s farm, wbicb defendant refused to sell upon tbe production of a purchaser ready and willing to pay tbe price, evidence that defendant bad improved tbe farm and altered its condition is inadmissible for tbe purpose of showing that any price previously fixed thereon was thereby necessarily changed, when tbe plaintiff had no knowledge of tbe altered conditions.</p>

Judges: Dunbar

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.