Howington v. Howington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court was authorized to grant relief not asserted in a pleading by the husband when the wife permitted the issue to be litigated without objection
• holding that the trial court was authorized to grant relief not asserted in a pleading by the husband when the wife permitted the issue to be litigated without objection
• holding that although Husband did not plead for reimbursement of pension benefits, the trial court did not err in granting Husband relief regarding those benefits because the issue was litigated without Wife’s objection
• “laches can be a defense to an action attacking the validity of a divorce decree. [Cits.]”
• \laches can be a defense to an action attacking the validity of a divorce decree. [Cits.]\
• wife who permitted issue not raised in pleadings to be litigated at hearing had waived any objections

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).