Howerton v. Pfaff

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “there is a wide difference between determining whether an injury actually exists and its cause” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• requiring expert testimony as to whether collision caused the plaintiff’s hernia, where first plaintiff first noticed “the lump” weeks after the accident and was not diagnosed with hernia until about six months after the collision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).