Howerton v. Howerton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the wife was not entitled to one-half of pension benefits to be paid when the husband retired at some time in the future because if the benefits increased, \the wife would be sharing in benefits acquired after the dissolution of the marriage\
• stating that it is improper to permit the former wife to share in the benefits acquired after the dissolution of the marriage by the former husband's continued employment at Southern Bell and contribution to retirement plan
• equitable distribution of 50% of husband's pension to wife did not entitle her to share in pension benefits acquired after dissolution of marriage
• fifth district remanded case to trial court instructing it to consider only pension benefits acquired during marriage, not \benefits acquired after the dissolution of marriage\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).