Skip to main content
· 3/4/1889

Hower v. Taggart

Citations

  • 2 Monag. 582
  • 1889 Pa. LEXIS 1366

Syllabus

<p>In an action for counsel fees and expenses, by an attorney-at-law, where it appears that the services were rendered and evidence is given as to their value, it is a question for the jury, and a verdict for the plaintiff will not bé reversed for a general submission to the jury, in the absence of a request for more specific instructions to the jury, although the plaintiff testified that he agreed as to part of his services that he would not charge for his time unless he won, which he failed to do.</p>

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.