Howell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[U]nder Howell’s interpretation, a condemned inmate would never face any time limitation in which to file a motion for -9- postconviction relief, because the inmate could always assert that postconviction counsel neglected to raise a claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mark James Asay v. State of Florida, SC16-102 Mark James Asay v. Julie L. Jones, etc. & SC16-628 Mark James Asay v. Julie L. Jones, etc.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2016-12-22· cited 110×
• William Earl Sweet v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2020-02-27
• Glen Edward Rogers v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2021-10-28
• David Kelsey Sparre v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2024-06-13
• Toney Deron Davis v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2025-07-17
• Harold Lee Harvey, Jr. v. State of Florida
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2026-06-18

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schwab v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2007-11-01· cited 64×
• Howell v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2013-02-19· cited 18×