Skip to main content
· 10/31/1991

Howell v. Spokane & Inland Empire Blood Bank

Citations

  • 818 P.2d 1056
  • 117 Wash. 2d 619
  • 1991 Wash. LEXIS 400

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that, “[u]nder CR 26(c), a judge is given broad discretion in fashioning discovery orders in order to protect a person’s privacy”
  • If a party fails to support assignments of error with legal arguments, they will not be considered on appeal
  • an appellate court will not consider an error claim a party fails to support with legal argument in his or her opening brief
  • \The plaintiff must come forward with evidence sufficient to establish the existence of each essential element of its case.\
  • an appellate court will not consider an error claim a party fails to support with legal argument in his or her opening brief
  • “The plaintiff must come forward with evidence sufficient to establish the existence of each essential element of its case.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.