· 10/31/1991
Howell v. Spokane & Inland Empire Blood Bank
Citations
- 818 P.2d 1056
- 117 Wash. 2d 619
- 1991 Wash. LEXIS 400
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that, “[u]nder CR 26(c), a judge is given broad discretion in fashioning discovery orders in order to protect a person’s privacy”
- If a party fails to support assignments of error with legal arguments, they will not be considered on appeal
- an appellate court will not consider an error claim a party fails to support with legal argument in his or her opening brief
- \The plaintiff must come forward with evidence sufficient to establish the existence of each essential element of its case.\
- an appellate court will not consider an error claim a party fails to support with legal argument in his or her opening brief
- “The plaintiff must come forward with evidence sufficient to establish the existence of each essential element of its case.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.