Skip to main content
· 10/21/1998

Howell v. Merritt Co.

Citations

  • 585 N.W.2d 278
  • 8 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1441
  • 1998 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 241
  • 1998 WL 734325

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that close proximity in time between employer’s discovery of employee’s condition and the employee’s discharge presented factual issue precluding summary judgment
  • noting that close proximity in time between employer’s discovery of employee’s condition and the employee’s discharge presented factual issue precluding summary judgment
  • noting that close proximity in time between employer’s discovery of employee’s condition and the employee’s discharge presented factual issue precluding summary judgment
  • reversing summary judgment ruling after concluding plaintiff rebutted defendant's nondiscriminatory reason for the termination
  • it was a jury question whether an employer terminated an employee in part because of a perception of disability associated with her use of a TENS device for back pain
  • it was a jury question whether an employer terminated an employee in part because of a perception of disability associated with her use of a TENS device for back pain

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGiverin, Larson, Lavorato, Neuman, Ternus

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.