Skip to main content
· 11/9/2006

Howell v. Marto Electric

Citations

  • 140 N.M. 737
  • 2006 NMCA 154
  • 148 P.3d 823

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that county had standing to test the legality of action taken by Indiana’s state tax board
  • holding, in case predating establishment of Tax Court, that Lake County had right to trial court judicial review of a final determination of the State Board of Tax Commissioners
  • holding, in case predating establishment of Tax Court, that Lake County had right to trial court judicial review of a final determination of the State Board of Tax Commissioners
  • \It would be anomalous ... to hold that a county or its officials cannot resolve in a court of law a bona fide dispute with a state agency over the application of a state statute.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pickard, Sutin, Wechsler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.