· 11/16/1920
Howell v. Howell's Admr.
Citations
- 189 Ky. 556
- 225 S.W. 477
- 1920 Ky. LEXIS 472
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Plaintiffs have not identified, nor has this Court found, any cases supporting their theory that FDA regulations ‘inactivate’ the learned intermediary doctrine.” (footnote omitted)
- “[T]he Court concludes that defendants’ duty to warn of the risks associated with the use of Enbrel ran to Ms. Small’s physician, not Ms. Small.”
- “In fact, the courts that have addressed similar arguments have all concluded that the learned intermediary doctrine is not abrogated by the medication guide regulations.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hurt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.