Skip to main content
· 11/16/1920

Howell v. Howell's Admr.

Citations

  • 189 Ky. 556
  • 225 S.W. 477
  • 1920 Ky. LEXIS 472

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Plaintiffs have not identified, nor has this Court found, any cases supporting their theory that FDA regulations ‘inactivate’ the learned intermediary doctrine.” (footnote omitted)
  • “[T]he Court concludes that defendants’ duty to warn of the risks associated with the use of Enbrel ran to Ms. Small’s physician, not Ms. Small.”
  • “In fact, the courts that have addressed similar arguments have all concluded that the learned intermediary doctrine is not abrogated by the medication guide regulations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hurt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.