Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 8/19/1980
Howell v. Howell
Citations
- 418 A.2d 181
- 1980 Me. LEXIS 637
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying appeal because appellant failed to present “a record of the proceedings in the District Court by which [the Court could] assess whether the District Court judge acted within, or outside, the limits of a sound discretion”
- record insufficient for either Superior Court or Law Court to ascertain whether District Court abused its discretion
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McKusick, Pomeroy, Wernick, Archibald, Godfrey, Nichols, Glassman, Du-Fresne, Delahanty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Farah v. FarahAppellate Court of Illinois· 1975-01-06· cited 28×
- Fitch v. WhaplesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1966-05-31· cited 26×
- Estes v. MasnerSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1968-05-06· cited 16×
- Tinney v. TinneyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-01-03· cited 14×
- NORTHERN MILL AND LUMBER COMPANY INC. v. MaynardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1980-03-19· cited 7×
- Marcus v. MarcusCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1970-10-13· cited 4×
- Greenberg v. GreenbergNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1951-02-07· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.