· 5/12/2009
Howell v. Hodap
Citations
- 212 P.3d 881
- 221 Ariz. 543
- 556 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 30
- 2009 WL 1311036
- 2009 Ariz. App. LEXIS 83
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the relevant inquiry is whether the claims “arise out of the same nucleus of facts.”
- \We review de novo the claim preclusive effect of a prior judgment.\
- issue preclusion synonymous with collateral estoppel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barker, Weisberg, Gemmill
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.