Skip to main content
· 5/12/2009

Howell v. Hodap

Citations

  • 212 P.3d 881
  • 221 Ariz. 543
  • 556 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 30
  • 2009 WL 1311036
  • 2009 Ariz. App. LEXIS 83

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the relevant inquiry is whether the claims “arise out of the same nucleus of facts.”
  • \We review de novo the claim preclusive effect of a prior judgment.\
  • issue preclusion synonymous with collateral estoppel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Barker, Weisberg, Gemmill

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.