Skip to main content
· 7/1/1857

Howe v. Scannell

Citations

  • 8 Cal. 325

Syllabus

<p>As a general rule, the vendor of goods is not a competent witness to impeach the sale made by himself.</p> <p>But where evidence is introduced showing a collusion between vendor and purchaser to defraud the creditors of the former, the declarations of the vendor are admissible, and, a fortiori, his sworn statement.</p>

Judges: Burnett, Terry

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.