Skip to main content
N.D. Ohio· 5/25/1994

Howe v. Hull

Citations

  • 874 F. Supp. 779
  • 1994 WL 682944

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an individual does not operate a public accommodation when she is only enforcing institutional policy
  • finding that ‘operate’ implies the performance of a function in conjunction with a degree of sanctioned authority
  • reasoning that the “Defendant cannot receive federal funds on the one hand, and on the other deny he is covered by the [Rehabilitation Act] simply because he received no federal funds for his involvement with [the plaintiff]”
  • denying individual’s motion for summary judgment because there was a dispute as to whether hospital’s Vice Chief of Staff was an “operator” of defendant hospital
  • finding potential liability under the Rehabilitation Act based upon a doctor’s failure to admit an AIDS patient
  • refusing to conclude as a matter of law that a physician’s refusal to treat a seriously ill patient for any discriminatory reason is not extreme and outrageous conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John W. Potter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.