Howe v. Health Facilities Appeals Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where statute limited judicial review to arbitrary or capricious standard, \the somewhat more rigorous substantial evidence test\ was not appropriate
• where statute limited judicial review to arbitrary or capricious standard, \the somewhat more rigorous substantial evidence test\ was not appropriate
• “Our search has revealed no statutory scheme in which the scope of judicial review was broader than the scope of review before the administrative body whose decision was subject to review”
• without some factual support, an agency decision would ordinarily be viewed as arbitrary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).