Howe v. Bank for International Settlements

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting the case law on Section 3(c) to stand for the proposition that “government officials are immune from Exchange Act -claims” (emphasis added)
• noting the “clarity of the statutory text” and holding that Section 3(c) “seems directly applicable to Federal Reserve officials”
• finding no excusable neglect because the defendants “were properly 15 served with the Complaint, the notice of entry of default”
• finding no excusable neglect because the defendants were served 8 with the complaint, the notice of entry of default, as well as the papers in support of the instant 9 motion
• applying sovereign immunity to official capacity suit against Secretary of the Treasury
• removal reasonably foreseeable where travel document request was 21 pending approval

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).