Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 3/24/1890

Howe MacHine Co. v. National Needle Co.

Citations

  • 134 U.S. 388
  • 10 S. Ct. 570
  • 33 L. Ed. 963
  • 1890 U.S. LEXIS 1980

Syllabus

<p>There was no novelty or invention in “ the combination of a griping chuck, by which an article can be so held by one end as to present the other . free to be operated upon, with a .rest preceding the cutting tool, when it is combined with a guide cam, or its equivalent, which modifies' the movement of the cutting tool, all operating'together for the purpose set forth,” which was patented to Charles Spring and Andrew Spring, by letters patent, dated May 10, 1859, and extended for seven years from May 10, 1873; and the letters patent therefor are therefore invalid.</p> <p>Pennsylvania Railroad v. Locomotive Truck Co., 110 U. S. 490, again affirmed.</p>

Judges: Fuller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.