Skip to main content
· 10/3/2006

Howard v. Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc.

Citations

  • 455 F. Supp. 2d 709
  • 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72187
  • 2006 WL 2846863

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying collateral estoppel and res judicata to claims under the Rehabilitation Act
  • “[S]mall class size and enhanced access to teachers ... ‘are the kind of advantages that might be preferred by parents of any child, disabled or not.’ ” (quoting M.H., 685 F.3d at 246)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Malley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.