· 10/26/1982
Howard v. State Com'n on Ethics
Citations
- 421 So. 2d 37
- 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 21535
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “revolving door” provision does not interfere with Supreme Court’s authority to regulate practice of law
- “revolving door” legislation supplements disciplinary rules
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwartz, Nesbitt and Jorgenson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.