Howard v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The evidence in this case was clearly sufficient to permit the trier of fact to infer that appellant intended to steal the requisite $100 or more.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lopez
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1966-04-06· cited 24×
• Charles v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-04-25· cited 22×
• Caviness v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1966-12-07· cited 18×
• Spratt v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-04-14· cited 15×
• Sample v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1976-11-03· cited 10×
• Moore v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1968-04-16· cited 7×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Brown v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-02-10· cited 55×
• Putnam v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-05-05· cited 50×
• Greene v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-01-08· cited 6×
• Pearre v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1965-01-07· cited 5×