Skip to main content

Howard v. State

Citations

  • 306 S.W.3d 407
  • 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 1234
  • 2010 WL 615721

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • following Williams and noting individual may be placed in fear where no actual threats are conveyed
  • “Under the ‘placed in fear’ language of [the robbery statute], the fact-finder may conclude that an individual was ‘placed in fear’ in circumstances where no actual threats are conveyed.”
  • “Under the ‘placed in fear’ language of Section 29.02, the fact-finder may conclude that an individual was ‘placed in fear’ in circumstances where no actual threats are conveyed.”
  • “Under the ‘placed in fear’ language of [the robbery statute], the fact-finder may conclude that an individual was ‘placed in fear,’ 12 in circumstances where no actual threats are conveyed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.