Howard v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating, A To the extent this case concerns a guilty plea, we must apply the standard which requires counsel to provide the defendant with an understanding of the law relating to the facts sufficient to insure an informed and conscious choice. @

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Howard v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-05-22· cited 37×
• State v. Williams
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-08-01· cited 24×
• Ex Parte Howard
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-02-27· cited 23×
• State v. David Williams
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2002-08-01

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wilbert Herring v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections
  Fifth Circuit· 1974-04-16· cited 245×
• Caraway v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1967-06-14· cited 39×
• Glaze v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1982-05-19· cited 4×