District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/30/2009
Howard v. State
Citations
- 27 So. 3d 104
- 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 20400
- 2009 WL 5126370
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an information amended for the sole purpose of adding a defendant’s alias did not vitiate the original information
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gerber, Polen, Stevenson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Wilcox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-06-07· cited 26×
- State v. McQuayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-09-08· cited 16×
- Freeman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-05-02· cited 12×
- State v. TermaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-12-17· cited 11×
- Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-11-23· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.