Howard v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• prior conviction for drug distribution admissible in order to show contested issue of intent
• “In a case that largely turned on whom the jury was going to believe, the improperly admitted evidence of the defendant’s prior conviction may have been the weight which caused the jurors to accept one version rather than the other”
• “In a case that largely turned on whom the jury was going to believe, the improperly admitted evidence of the defendant’s prior conviction may have been the weight which caused the jurors to accept one version rather than the other.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Spain v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-04-07· cited 70×
• Dionas v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2013-12-10· cited 57×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1993-10-29· cited 34×
• Stevenson v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-01-27· cited 18×
• State v. Jordan
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2022-08-15· cited 10×
• Paydar v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-11-22· cited 3×
• Austin v. Smith
  D. Maryland· 1996-01-05· cited 2×
• Hurst v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-10-26· cited 1×
• Sykes v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-11-18
• Colkley v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2021-07-02