Howard v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• answer which did not set forth any of the specifics listed in the statute was insufficient
• failure to comply with the strict pleading requirements of OCGA § 16-13-49 (o) (3) when answering an in rem forfeiture petition is equivalent to filing no answer at all

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rojas v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1998-02-23· cited 27×
• Bettis v. State of Georgia
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-08-11· cited 20×
• Portee v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-01-23· cited 18×
• Dearing v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-03-28· cited 18×
• Tuggle v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-01-24· cited 14×
• Baker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2004-09-24· cited 12×
• Arreola-Soto v. State of Georgia
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-02-16· cited 8×
• Edwards v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2008-03-24· cited 5×
• Loveless v. State of Georgia
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-05-27· cited 4×
• Woods v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-03-28· cited 3×
• Glenn v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-08· cited 1×
• State v. Huff
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-10-13
• Morrell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-04-03
• Frederick Cortez Glenn v. State of Georgia
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2013-03-08

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State of Ga. v. Alford
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1994-06-06· cited 49×
• Jarrett v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-03-11· cited 16×
• Jackson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-09-01· cited 16×
• Harris v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-06-28· cited 13×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-06-27· cited 12×