District Court of Appeal of Florida· 12/27/1991
Howard v. State
Citations
- 591 So. 2d 1067
- 1991 WL 275583
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that officer’s testimony of actual straight line and detoured measurement from a location based on his viewing of a videotape of the transaction was sufficient
- holding distance is measured in a straight line
- where written order does not conform to the oral pronouncement of judgment the latter controls
- in criminal case, written judgment must conform to oral pronouncement
- oral pronouncement prevails over written sentence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. HaskinsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1993-04-15· cited 10×
- Ulano v. AndersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-11-23· cited 8×
- People v. Christman 9/10/4 CA1/4California Court of Appeal· 2014-09-10· cited 6×
- Luke v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-01· cited 5×
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1998-11-30· cited 3×
- Rivera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-06-08· cited 3×
- Gillen v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-16· cited 3×
- O'Neal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-01-17· cited 2×
- Reese v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-03-19
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.