· 11/25/1987
Howard v. PINE FORGE ACADEMY, PINE FORGE, PA.
Citations
- 678 F. Supp. 1120
- 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11217
- 48 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,634
- 46 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1861
- 1987 WL 39650
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that because timeliness is a “an issue upon which [the] plaintiff will bear the burden of proof at trial, she is obliged to come forward with some evidence to counter defendants’ challenge to the timeliness of her EEOC complaint”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Troutman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.