Howard v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

Citations

• 244 N.E.3d 657
• 2024 Ohio 1948

Syllabus

Trial court did not err by dismissing appellant's complaint against Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (\DRC\) because the burden was on appellant, a pro se inmate, to submit a cashier's statement that complied with R.C. 2969.25(C)(1). Because appellant failed to comply with R.C. 2969.25(C)(1) upon filing his complaint, the trial court was compelled to dismiss his complaint for the lack of jurisdiction. Judgment affirmed.