Howard v. Office of the Chief Administrative Officer of the United States House of Representatives

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing First Morris on the grounds that “certainly it does not appear that the deficiency action on the note [in that case] was brought primarily to obtain greater counsel fees.”
• “[C]ontractual fee-shifting agreements in the lender/borrower context are generally enforceable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).