Howard v. Nicholls

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in reviewing administrative decision, court must affirm if substantial evidence supports it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Matter of Wines
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-28· cited 29×
• Wetzel v. Arizona State Real Estate Department
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-07-24· cited 25×
• Siler v. Arizona Department of Real Estate
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-06-04· cited 25×
• Maricopa County v. Gottsponer
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-06-24· cited 20×
• Sigmen v. Arizona Department of Real Estate
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-05-13· cited 17×
• McMurren v. JMC Builders, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-02-25· cited 10×
• Taylor v. Arizona Law Enforcement Merit System Council
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-08-14· cited 9×
• DeCarlo v. MCSA, INC.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1988-03-29· cited 6×
• Bear v. Nicholls
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1984-11-20· cited 6×
• Williams v. Tucson Unified School District No. 1
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1987-12-10· cited 4×
• Tabora v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-07-03· cited 1×
• Taylor v. ARIZ. LAW ENFORCEMENT MERIT SYSTEM
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-08-14
• McMURREN v. JMC BUILDERS
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-02-25