Howard v. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was not erroneous for the trial court to conclude that the second mortgage obligation was in the nature of support considering the parties' disparate earnings potential along with the amount of support and maintenance awarded to the former spouse
• stating the “structure of the 5 terms of the final decree” is used in determining “whether an obligation stemming from a divorce decree is in the nature of alimony, support or maintenance, or whether it is in fact a property settlement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Mosser v. Mosser
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2000-05-26· cited 19×
• Marriage of Bean v. Bean
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2009-02-11· cited 11×
• Reich v. Reich
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1993-01-12· cited 9×
• In Re the Marriage of Diane K. Bjornstad and Edward W. Bjornstad Upon the Petition of Diane K. Bjornstad N/K/A Heggestad, and Concerning Edward W. Bjornstad
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2016-12-21

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Bankr. L. Rep. P 69,922 Nancy H. Shaver v. Peter Frank Shaver
  Ninth Circuit· 1984-07-03· cited 216×
• In the Matter of Floyd Raymond Woods, Bankrupt. Appeal of Judith Jean Crabb, Objecting
  Seventh Circuit· 1977-06-01· cited 83×
• In Re Dennis Neil Maitlen, Bankrupt. Joyce A. Maitlen v. Dennis Neil Maitlen
  Seventh Circuit· 1981-08-24· cited 77×
• In the Matter of Rodney Coil, Bankrupt. Appeal of Rodney Coil
  Seventh Circuit· 1982-06-16· cited 76×
• Bankr. L. Rep. P 68,050 Mary Frances Erspan, Cross-Appellant v. Lloyd J. Badgett, Cross-Appellee
  Fifth Circuit· 1981-06-10· cited 49×
• Coster v. Coster
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1983-08-09· cited 43×
• Lake County Department of Public Welfare v. Marino (In Re Marino)
  N.D. Indiana· 1983-04-26· cited 39×
• Howard & Sons, Inc. v. Schmidt (In Re Schmidt)
  N.D. Indiana· 1986-10-06· cited 38×
• Buccino v. Buccino
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1990-08-23· cited 31×
• Russo v. Wisniewski (In Re Wisniewski)
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1990-01-12· cited 27×
• Hixson v. Hixson (In Re Hixson)
  S.D. Ohio· 1982-10-08· cited 24×
• Story v. Story (In Re Story)
  M.D. Florida· 1983-11-16· cited 21×
• Vande Zande v. Vande Zande (In Re Vande Zande)
  W.D. Wisconsin· 1982-08-04· cited 20×
• Beeson v. Beeson
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1989-05-30· cited 20×
• Pfenninger v. Pfenninger
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1984-05-29· cited 18×
• Hopkins v. Hopkins
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1989-11-21· cited 16×
• Bicknell v. Stanley (In Re Bicknell)
  S.D. Indiana· 1990-08-28· cited 16×
• Young v. Young (In Re Young)
  D. Rhode Island· 1987-04-15· cited 15×
• In Re Reak
  E.D. Wisconsin· 1988-09-30· cited 14×
• Hall v. Hall (In Re Hall)
  M.D. Florida· 1990-09-14· cited 11×