District of Columbia· 7/27/2010
Howard v. Locke
Citations
- 729 F. Supp. 2d 85
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77200
- 2010 WL 2989844
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a plaintiff’s opposition to a defendant’s motion cannot properly be deemed “a response to defendant’s motion” where plaintiff “fails to contest or otherwise address the legal authority cited by defendant” (emphasis in original)
- “It is well understood in this Circuit that when a plaintiff files an opposition to a motion ... addressing only certain arguments raised by the defendant, a court may treat those arguments that the plaintiff failed to address as conceded.”
- “It is well understood in this Circuit that when a plaintiff files an opposition to a motion . . . addressing only certain arguments raised by the defendant, a court may treat those arguments that the plaintiff failed to address as conceded.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Richard J. Leon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.