Howard v. Frondell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an “unjust enrichment” claim failed because “[t]here can be no double recovery”
• strict enforcement of rule that a party appears when it serves or files any paper in the proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).