Howard v. De Cordova
Citations
- 177 U.S. 609
- 20 S. Ct. 817
- 44 L. Ed. 908
- 1900 U.S. LEXIS 1831
Syllabus
<p>Following Cooper v. Newell, 173 U. S. 555, it is held that the judgment of the Texas court which is attacked in this case may be the subject of collateral attack in the courts of the United States, sitting in the same territory in a suit between citizens of Louisiana and citizens of Texas.</p> <p>By c. 95, §§ 13, 14 of the Laws of Texas of 1847 and 1848, the affidavit by the plaintiff or his attorney as to the want of knowledge of the names of the parties defendant or their residence is made an essential prerequisite of the jurisdiction of the court to issue an order for publication. In the state court the affidavit was therefore jurisdictional in its character, and its verity was directly assailed by the averments of the present bill, which were admitted by the demurrer.</p>
Judges: White, After Making the Foregoing Statement
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court· 1944-05-15· cited 1,010×
- Donald L. Snell v. Cleveland, Inc., and Patricia Faber John Does Jane DoesNinth Circuit· 2002-12-04· cited 780×
- Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1909-09-14· cited 235×
- Realty Holding Co. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court· 1925-05-25· cited 78×
- Holman v. Carpenter Technology Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1980-01-24· cited 38×
- Roosevelt Moore v. Coats Company and Jack P. Hennessy Co., IncThird Circuit· 1959-09-23· cited 32×
- Kiser v. General Electric Corp.Third Circuit· 1987-10-14· cited 23×
- Yarbrough v. BlakeW.D. Arkansas· 1962-12-18· cited 17×
- Winn v. Consolidated Coach CorporationSixth Circuit· 1933-05-09· cited 15×
- Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc. v. RitterNinth Circuit· 1937-07-15· cited 8×
- Shary v. EszlingerNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1920-03-02· cited 7×
- Johnson v. HunterEighth Circuit· 1906-08-20· cited 5×
- Exchange Nat. Bank v. Joseph Reid Gas Engine Co.Fifth Circuit· 1923-03-13· cited 3×
- Lykins v. Westinghouse ElectricE.D. Kentucky· 1988-08-26· cited 3×
- Kiser v. General Electric CorporationThird Circuit· 1987-10-27
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.