Howard v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding probable cause determination under the totality of the circumstances, including an officer’s perception that item found in defendant’s trash was marijuana because a trained police officer “had the necessary expertise to determine the substance was marijuana.”
• upholding probable cause determination under the totality of the circumstances, including an officer’s perception that item found in defendant’s trash was marijuana because a trained police officer “had the necessary expertise to determine the substance was marijuana.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Illinois v. Gates
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
• Neil v. Biggers
  Supreme Court· 1972-12-06· cited 7,056×
• Maryland v. Garrison
  Supreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 1,107×
• Kentucky State Racing Commission v. Fuller
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1972-04-28· cited 188×
• Talbott v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1998-03-19· cited 94×
• Harper v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1985-05-02· cited 80×
• Commonwealth v. Neal
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky· 2002-03-29· cited 71×
• Roark v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2002-09-26· cited 51×
• Commonwealth v. Pride
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2010-01-21· cited 45×
• O'NAN v. Ecklar Moore Express, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1960-10-21· cited 24×
• Canler v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 1994-01-31· cited 23×
• Epps v. Commonwealth
  Kentucky Supreme Court· 2009-08-27· cited 15×