Howard v. Blue Ridge Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the Fair Credit Reporting 24 Act preempts a similar claim under the Unfair Competition Law
• concluding “that the FCRA does clearly preclude injunctive relief” to private litigants
• rejecting argument that state law claim is not 23 inconsistent with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) and simply provides an additional state 24 remedy for the unlawful conduct giving rise to the FCRA claim
• rejecting argument that state law claim is not 10 inconsistent with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) and simply provides an additional state 11 remedy for the unlawful conduct giving rise to the FCRA claim
• “Because the Court finds that 2 plaintiff's § 17200 claim is preempted by the FCRA, he cannot obtain an injunction for 3 this claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).