Howard v. Barron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In the majority of business dealings, opposite parties have trust and confidence in each other’s integrity, but there is no confidential relationship by this alone.”
• although normally an issue for the jury, the nature of a relationship can be determined as a matter of law when the facts are patent, unambiguous and undisputed
• motion for a directed verdict improper because there was an issue of fact whether a confidential relationship existed between a seller and a buyer in real estate transaction and the matter was required to be determined by a jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).