Skip to main content
· 9/30/1986

Howard Shlay v. James Montgomery, Harold Washington & City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation

Citations

  • 802 F.2d 918
  • 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 31485

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing why a “career service exempt” employee of the City of Chicago did not have a property interest in his continued employment
  • finding employment contract could not be created where corporation counsel had no authority to create a career position for person in plaintiff's position
  • finding employment contract could not be created where corporation counsel had no authority to create a career position for person in plaintiffs position
  • discussing why a “career service exempt” employee of the City of No. 02-3862 5 Chicago did not have a property interest in his continued employment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood, Cudahy, Flaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.