Howard Oaks, Inc. v. Maryland National Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[l]ender malpractice suits based on … ‘side agreements’ are precisely the sort of mischief that the Maryland legislature intend to curtail by enactment of [the MCAA].”
• “Confessed judgments are judgments on the merits, entitled to preclusive effect under Maryland law . . . .” (citing Boyce v. Plitt, 335 A.2d 101, 103 (Md. 1975)
• “[T]his Court holds that, under the U.C.C. as well as the general law of Maryland, there is no independent duty of good faith in commercial dealing enforceable by an action ex delicto.”
• “[T]his Court holds that, under the U.C.C. as well as the general law of Maryland, there is no independent duty of good faith in commercial dealing enforceable by an action ex delicto.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).