Howard M. Weiser, and Lenore Weiser Robert J. And Helen M.L. Stein John McLeish and Nils Parson v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting taxpayer challenge to disallowance of deductions under AMT on inequity grounds
• simply stating that \[o]ur review is not limited to a consideration of the grounds upon which the district court decided the issues\
• “[This court] can affirm the district court on any grounds supported by the record.”
• “[This court] can affirm the district court on any grounds supported by the record.”
• “Congress specifically intended to limit the number and type of itemized deductions to be considered in calculating the AMTI, and thus AMT provisions are ‘structurally unsuited’ to the application of section 58(h).”
• “[This court] can affirm the district court on any grounds supported by the record.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).