Skip to main content
· 3/29/2018

HOWARD M. TALENFELD and JULIE ZOBEL TALENFELD v. ROBINETTE HOMES SIGNATURE SERIES, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Section 269(a) requires the fact finder to make a subjective evaluation of the taxpayer’s motives
  • the conversion of equipment from producing full-fashioned hosiery to making full flat fabric was not substantial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.