Skip to main content
· 1/25/1994

Howard Kool Chevrolet, Inc. v. Blomstedt

Citations

  • 2 Neb. Ct. App. 493
  • 511 N.W.2d 222
  • 25 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 310
  • 1994 Neb. App. LEXIS 23

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a specific clause in the contract governed the purported breach rather than an implied covenant
  • enforcing a non-compete clause in a corporate agency agreement between Nationwide and an independent contractor
  • “In construing the terms of any contract, the principal objective is to determine the intention of the parties.”
  • “In construing the terms of any contract, the principal objective is to determine the intention of the parties.”
  • “There can be no implied covenants in a contract in relation to any matter specifically covered by the written terms of the contract itself.”
  • a court may not construe an implied covenant that a contract is only terminable for cause, when the contract expressly states that it is terminable without cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hannon, Lerman, Miller, Sievers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.