· 1/25/1994
Howard Kool Chevrolet, Inc. v. Blomstedt
Citations
- 2 Neb. Ct. App. 493
- 511 N.W.2d 222
- 25 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 310
- 1994 Neb. App. LEXIS 23
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a specific clause in the contract governed the purported breach rather than an implied covenant
- enforcing a non-compete clause in a corporate agency agreement between Nationwide and an independent contractor
- “In construing the terms of any contract, the principal objective is to determine the intention of the parties.”
- “In construing the terms of any contract, the principal objective is to determine the intention of the parties.”
- “There can be no implied covenants in a contract in relation to any matter specifically covered by the written terms of the contract itself.”
- a court may not construe an implied covenant that a contract is only terminable for cause, when the contract expressly states that it is terminable without cause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hannon, Lerman, Miller, Sievers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.