Howard J. Kotlicky v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that pro se plaintiff was required to make these showings on his Rule 60(b) motion
• indicating that all district court orders will be subject to modification and revision to the extent they are non-final, especially where an order was not relied upon by the parties
• instructing the jury on the exact timeline of TLC suspension notices, hearing requests, administrative judge decisions, and TLC chair final determinations
• on timely 60(b) motion, short notice of deposition and involuntary failure to appear were excusable neglect
• on timely 60(b) motion, short notice of deposition and involuntary failure to appear were excusable neglect
• corporal punishment of students may shock the conscience if the 14 resulting injury is “so severe” and “disproportionate” as to constitute “a brutal and inhumane abuse of official power”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).